Home

Visitors

Events

Barbecue

News

Articles

Competing

BBQ FAQ

Recipes

Membership

Links


     You are here: > Home > Judging > Weighting factorsGo Back

Understanding the weighting factors used in KCBS judging

By JOE O'CONNELL, cbbqa past President 
Updated April 21, 2002

The Kansas City Barbecue Society (KCBS) currently weights the raw scores of judges at contests.  Each raw appearance score is converted to a weighted score by multiplying it by 0.5714;  each raw taste score is converted to a weighted score by multiplying it by 2.2858;  and each raw tenderness score is converted to a weighted score by multiplying it by 1.1428 -- as explained in the applicable KCBS Rules, which is KCBS Rule 19.

Reason for the strange numbers

There is a historical reason for the seemingly strange weighting factors that are used in KCBS scoring.  The history may be told very briefly as follows.

Originally taste was given twice the weight 

In the beginning, the appearance, taste and tenderness scores were given the range of from 9 to 1, with 9 being highest.  However, the taste score was doubled (multiplied by 2), because in those days KCBS wanted to give twice as much weight to the taste score as it gave to the appearance and tenderness scores.

Originally 180 was a perfect score

Therefore, if a single judge scored an entry with 9-9-9, the entry would receive a total of 36 points from that judge.  

Note:  in this and elsewhere, scores are always listed in the order of appearance, taste and tenderness.

Under the KCBS rules, the low score was disregarded ("thrown out") in calculating an entries total score.  Thus, if an entry received scores of 9-9-9, 9-9-9, 9-9-9, 9-9-9, 9-9-9 and 2-2-2, the low score would be disregarded.  Therefore, the highest possible score would be 180 points - a perfect 180 - equal to 36 points times 5 judges.

New rule changed the weighting

In 1999, KCBS changed the weighting system.  Prior to 1999, taste was given twice the weight as appearance and tenderness, and it was a simple matter to double the taste score and then add the appearance and tenderness scores to determine the final weighted scores.  For example, a raw score of 8-8-9 became a weighted score of 8+(8+8)+9 or 33.

For 1999, KCBS decided to change the weighting so that tenderness is given twice the weight as appearance and taste is given twice the weight as tenderness.  

However, KCBS also decided not to change the fact that the raw scores must be from 9 to 1, that the highest possible score by a single judge must be 36 weighted points, and that the highest possible score by all judges must be 180 weighted point - a perfect 180.

This created a mathematical conundrum:  what numbers to use as weighting factors that would keep a 9 to 1 range of raw scores, a 36 point weighted score maximum per judge, and a 180 point weighted score maximum per entry?

Rule of 7

The Rule of 7 solves the problem.  To understand the Rule of 7, consider that, if 4 is the taste, 2 is the tenderness, and 1 is the appearance, then the taste is worth twice the tenderness, and the tenderness is worth twice the appearance.  

Thus, the taste score will have, as one of its elements, the factor of 4 divided by 7, or 4/7;  similarly, tenderness will have 2/7;  and appearance will have 1/7.  Since all these ratios use a common denominator of 7, this is called the Rule of 7.

The Rule of 7 solves the issue of how to weight taste to equal twice as much as tenderness, and tenderness to equal twice as much as appearance.  But the Rule of 7 has to be tied into the maximum weighted limitations of 36 points per judge.

Factor of 4

To tie the Rule of 7 into the maximum of 36 points per judge, consider that, in the old system, a score of 9-9-9 was converted by doubling the taste score into 9+(9+9)+9.  This means that, if a judge awards 9-9-9 under the new system, the new system has to convert the score into 36 points.

That is, the Rule of 7 succeeds in weighting each of the raw scores from 9 to 1, but these must then be multiplied by 4 in order to total a weighted score from a single judge of from 36 (a perfect score) to a disqualification score.

To do so, the raw scores have to be weighted as follows:  the ratios under the Rule of 7 must be multiplied by 4, and that result must be multiplied by the raw score in each of the three areas of appearance, taste and tenderness.

Weighting factors

Based upon the Rule of 7 and the Factor of 4, the weighting factors can be constructed as follows.

In the case of appearance, the raw score is converted to a weighted score by multiplying the raw appearance score by 1/7 times 4.  In the case of taste, the raw score is converted by multiplying the raw taste score by 4/7 times 4.  In the case of tenderness, the raw score is converted by multiplying the raw tenderness score by 2/7 times 4.  

By using these weighting factors, a perfect raw score of 9-9-9 by a single judge will be converted into a perfect weighted score of 36, as follows:

A raw score of 9 in appearance times 1/7 times 4 equals a weighted appearance score of 5.14285714285714285714285714285714

A raw score of 9 in taste times 4/7 times 4 equals a weighted taste score of  20.5714285714285714285714285714286

A raw score of 9 in appearance times 2/7 times 4 equals a weighted appearance score of 10.2857142857142857142857142857143

These three weighted scores added together equal a total weighted score of 35.9999999999999999999999999999956

Rounding rules

As shown above, using more than 30 digits is even insufficient to exactly equal 36 points.  KCBS studied these factors and realized that, if the factors were rounded to four places, then a perfect score of 36 was possible.  Here's how. 

The ratio of 1/7 times 4 equals 0.571428571428571428571428571428571.  This can be rounded to 0.5714 (using the normal rules of rounding up and rounding down), which is set forth in KCBS Rule 19 as the appearance weighting factor.  

The ratio of 4/7 times 4 equals 2.28571428571428571428571428571429.  This can be rounded to 2.2857 (using the normal rules of rounding up and rounding down), but KCBS uses a slightly different factor of 2.2858, which is set forth in KCBS Rule 19 as the taste weighting factor.

The ratio of 2/7 times 4 equals 1.14285714285714285714285714285714.  This can be rounded to 1.1429 (using the normal rules of rounding up and rounding down), but KCBS uses a slightly different factor of 1.1428, which is set forth in KCBS Rule 19 as the tenderness weighting factor.

Application of KCBS Rule 19

When a single judge awards a perfect score of 9-9-9, the weighting factors have the following results:

A raw score of 9 in appearance times the appearance weighting factor of 0.5714 equals a weighted appearance score of 5.1426

A raw score of 9 in taste times the taste weighting factor of 2.2858 equals a weighted taste score of 20.5722

A raw score of 9 in tenderness times the tenderness weighting factor of 1.1428 equals a weighted tenderness score of 10.2852

These three weighted scores added together equal a total weighted score of 36.0000.

Therefore, the application of the KCBS Rule 19 weighting factors converts a perfect raw score by a single judge of 9-9-9 into a perfect weighted score by a single judge of 36.  Furthermore, this results in the conversion of a perfect score of 9-9-9 by all five judges (with the score of the six judge being discarded) into a perfect weighted score of 180 weighted points, which is called the Perfect 180.


Related information

 Rules and Judging Menu

Scoring 2004
Overview
First-Time Judge's Story
Instructions for Judges
Table Captains
Ed Roith's CBJ Class
Official KCBS Rules
Schools
Ties Breaking
Weighting Factors
Weighting Factor Error


Send us your comments and questions

 

© 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 California Barbecue Association, Inc.
A non-profit, tax-exempt corporation.  All rights reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelinesEmail your questions or comments.